Scientifically proven ways to study
Nov 25, 2021
iCrowdMarketing powered by iCrowdNewswire
Changing learning places affects the ability to learn and concentrate. A psychologist suggests that simply changing rooms to study can increase both your focus and retention levels. The first time you listen to a lecture or study something new, you will retain up to 80% of what you have just learned if you review the material within 24 hours. Fortunately, this effect is cumulative.So, after a week, you can keep 100% of the information in just five minutes of testing. In general, psychologists agree that this type of intermittent study is preferable to cramming.
This controversial research method was a hot topic in 2009 when a psychology professor published an article advising students not to read textbooks over and over again, which he said only made students irritated.
On the contrary, he suggests that students use positive prompts: close the book and recite whatever they can remember up to that point to practice long-term memorization. There is a scientific method that asks students to learn, through repetition, topics they know less about. The system consists of moving the cards with the correct answer in a row of squares and moving the cards with the wrong answer to the first square.
So the cards in the first box are studied most often, and the interval becomes larger as the student moves forward in the row, forcing him to revisit information he doesn't know over and over again. As you would with the ACT, SAT, or GMAT, take advantage of professors and instructors who have provided old tests as practice tests. History notes should be made in points by the students.
You can get a feel for the instructor's testing style and familiarize yourself with how the information might be presented on the actual test day. A 2011 study found that students who tested themselves with a practice test after studying the material retained 50% more information a week later than students who did not. take the practice test.
Experts say that the difference between slow learners and fast learners is how they learn; For example, instead of memorizing, fast learners make connections between ideas. Called contextual learning, this process requires students to customize their learning methods, making inspiring connections so that every information falls into place and makes sense for each individual.
Some students find that visually recording all the information in one place (such as on a piece of paper or board) can help paint a more complete picture and allow them to make connections. in the learning process. To use this method and learn how to research effectively, first determine what you want to learn. Then try to explain it as you would to a five-year-old. Students should make proper notes on every topic.
The Feynman method is great for using analogies to further illustrate your concept (e.g. a bonsai tree is like a large tree, but smaller). Research shows that students have better memory and recall skills when they learn new information while they wait to teach it to others. This makes sense since teachers are not only responsible for finding out information for themselves, but also for organizing key parts of that information to make it clear to others.
Studies also show that students are more engaged and will instinctively look for methods of recalling and organizing when they are expected to take on the role of teacher. This can be especially effective with subjects like reading and science, although part of the magic is figuring out how you will "teach" each subject on a case-by-case basis. Metacognition, or thinking, is based on self-perception.
To achieve this, students must be able to assess their skill level and place in the learning process, as well as monitor their emotional state around potentially stressful learning activities. straight. Once you can go through your flashcards without making a single mistake, you may feel satisfied and call it a day, or you may feel an adrenaline rush and want to keep learning.
With limited time to research each topic, you should move on. Multitasking is a myth. For example, you may think you are killing two birds with one stone by texting while studying, but you are having bad study habits. What the researchers say is multitasking prolongs your study time and can ultimately affect your score.
Researchers and learning experts debate the concept of learning styles, some even saying they don't exist. Our conclusion is: Despite the volume of work on the topic, scientists have found virtually no evidence to support the concept of learning styles, although they have left room for further investigation in the coming years.